Letter of support: COC still under SA, risks not addressed by move
Dear ___
I am writing to express my alarm at the current moves to force the
Syracuse University Outing Club (SUOC) from the Student Association to
become a Club Sport under Rec. Services. I doubt that any other part of
OGLEL provides more worthwhile experiential learning opportunities than
SUOC, and I fear that moving SUOC outside of the Student Association and
student governance would cause irrevocable damage.
Given the uproar on the SUOC alumni email list, I'm sure you will receive
other letters attesting to the value of SUOC as a student-run organization
within the Student Association. I would like instead to focus on two
specific issues.
First, Mitch Gartenburg and others have stated that SU wishes to emulate
Cornell's successful outdoor education program and have suggested that
this is somehow incompatible with the existence of SUOC as a Student
Association club. Our experience at Cornell is quite the opposite: the
Cornell Outing Club remains a Student Association club while Cornell
Outdoor Education is a University department. In fact, the director of
Cornell Outdoor Education, Todd Miner (607-255-8004, tm49@cornell.edu),
recently expressed his support for this model in an email to the SUOC
email list:
At Cornell the Outing Club is still very much alive and well and
kicking, and it is not under recreational services. It remains an
independent club, I believe under the general student government.Thankfully, at Cornell we enjoy many outdoor organizations. The
Cornell Outing Club provides backcountry and outdoor recreational
opportunities for the campus and community. TEVA does the same
thing for Jewish students and the community. Cornell Outdoor Education
provides outdoor and adventure physical education, student
leadership, and teambuilding. A number of other clubs and units
practice all kinds of outdoor recreation and education (skiing,
sailing, natural history, etc.).As the head of COE I very much value and appreciate the mission
and role of the Cornell Outing Club.
Second, I would like to question one of the contradictions in arguments
put forward about risk-management. If Dean Baker and Rec. Services claim
that the move from SA to Rec. Services is necessary because of "risk
management issues", it is incongruous to argue simultaneously that there
will be no changes to the way SUOC is run. I understand that the
University has a responsibility to manage risk and also that random
reorganization will not mitigate risk. However, if these risk management
issues can be articulated (they haven't been to date) then there could be
a constructive dialog about how to address them under the current
framework.
I thank you for your time considering this issue and I hope that SUOC will
remain as valuable a part of the experience of Syracuse students as it has
been for the past 70 years.
Yours sincerely,
Simeon Warner
(Cornell Outing Club Advisor)
